"What we need is… a third way
between the longstanding models
of war and peace. Movement in
this direction is already under way."
— Yale Law professor John Fabian Witt,
"The Legal Fog Between War and Peace"
Tolstoy he ain't.
Witt's remarks appeared yesterday
evening (between 8 and 9 PM EDT)
in the online New York Times .
For related "third way" material, see
yesterday's 7 PM EDT post in this journal.
Lee Marvin in the 1983 film Gorky Park
For related material, see yesterday's post on Nietzsche's
Birth of Tragedy and a May 27, 2010, post— Masks .
The link to the Masks post was suggested by four things:
* The title is in memory of business writer Mike Hammer.
|
"In logic, the law of excluded middle (or the principle of excluded middle) is the third of the so-called three classic laws of thought. It states that for any proposition, either that proposition is true, or its negation is. The law is also known as the law (or principle) of the excluded third (or of the excluded middle), or, in Latin, principium tertii exclusi. Yet another Latin designation for this law is tertium non datur: 'no third (possibility) is given.'" |
"Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right"
— Songwriter who died on January 4, 2011.
Online NY Times on the date of the songwriter's death—
"A version of this review appeared in print
on January 4, 2011, on page C6 of the New York edition."
"The philosopher Hubert Dreyfus and his former student
Sean Dorrance Kelly have a story to tell, and it is not
a pretty tale for us moderns. Ours is an age of nihilism,
they say, meaning not so much that we have nothing
in which to believe, but that we don’t know how to choose
among the various things to which we might commit
ourselves. Looking down from their perches at Berkeley
and Harvard, they see the 'human indecision that
plagues us all.'"
For an application of the excluded-middle law, see
Non-Euclidean Blocks and Deep Play.
Violators of the law may have trouble* distinguishing
between "Euclidean" and "non-Euclidean" phenomena
because their definition of the latter is too narrow,
based only on examples that are historically well known.
See the Non-Euclidean Blocks footnote.
* Followers of the excluded-middle law will avoid such
trouble by noting that "non-Euclidean" should mean
simply "not Euclidean in some way "— not necessarily
in a way contradicting Euclid's parallel postulate.
But see Wikipedia's defense of the standard, illogical,
usage of the phrase "non-Euclidean."
Postscript—
Tertium Datur
"Here I am, stuck in the middle with you."
Powered by WordPress
