Log24

Sunday, March 22, 2026

Non-MOG Pattern Symmetry

Filed under: General — Tags: — m759 @ 8:36 am

The Miracle Octad Generator (MOG) of R. T. Curtis
greatly simplified the study of the 759 octads in the
Steiner system S(5, 8, 24).

The MOG arranges these octads very neatly in a 4×6 array
of square unit cells. There is, however, one aesthetic drawback
to the arrangement . . . It lacks symmetry under the natural
rotations and reflections of the entire 4×6 rectangular array.

A note of my own from 1981 may or may not lead eventually 
to a rearrangement of the 759 octads, each within a 4×6 array,
that does  have such overall symmetry under the symmetries
of a bare 4×6 rectangle . . . If, that is, such overall symmetry is
even possible, in light of purely group-theoretic considerations.

(Exercise: Would such symmetry imply the existence of a normal
subgroup in a group known to have no such subgroups?)

Previous posts in this journal have described approaches to the 
above symmetric-rearrangement problem . . . a problem that 
could be posed more generally, for binary patterns other than
those of the MOG.

Symmetric Generation of a Linear Code

The following Magma code shows that although the above space has
12 dimensions, it is NOT the Golay-code space.

// 260322 Magma Check March 22, 2026

> K := FiniteField(2);
> C := LinearCode<K, 24 |
> [0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,1],
> [0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,1,1,0,1],
> [0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,0],
> [0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,1,0],
> [1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,1],
> [1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,1],
> [0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,1,0,1],
> [0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,1,1],
> [1,0,1,1,0,0,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0],
> [1,1,1,1,0,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0],
> [1,1,0,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1],
> [1,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1],
> [0,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0],
> [0,1,1,0,0,1,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0],
> [1,1,1,0,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0],
> [1,0,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0],
> [1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,1,0,1,0,0,1,1],
> [0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,1,1,1,1],
> [0,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,1,0],
> [1,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,0],
> [0,1,0,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1],
> [1,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1],
> [1,1,1,1,1,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0],
> [0,1,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,0,0],
//
// Bricks
> [1,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0],
> [0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0],
> [0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,1],
// Top and bottom halves
> [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0],
> [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1],
// Left and right halves
> [1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0],
> [0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1]>;
//
> Dimension(C);
> MinimumWeight(C);
> WeightDistribution(C);

12
4
[ <0, 1>, <4, 42>, <8, 591>, <12, 2828>,
<16, 591>, <20, 42>, <24, 1> ]

Here are some earlier Log24 images related to this topic.

Wednesday, December 17, 2025

The Klein Quadric and the MOG

Filed under: General — Tags: — m759 @ 10:05 am

A screenshot of a Gemini 3 summary . . .

Tuesday, May 6, 2025

Grok 3 “Deeper Search” on
the Klein Correspondence and the MOG*

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 7:43 am

https://x.com/i/grok/share/6S3wugra7IfdMQGn0AvDjEC5V .

Conclusion

"In conclusion, the Klein correspondence and the MOG are intricately linked through Conwell's correspondence, which aligns partitions of an 8-set with lines in PG(3,2), forming the backbone of the MOG's construction. This relationship enables the MOG to effectively study the Mathieu group M24 and related structures, bridging geometric and combinatorial mathematics. The detailed exploration reveals the depth of this connection, highlighting its significance in advanced mathematical research as of May 6, 2025."

— Grok 3 "Deeper Search"

* The "Miracle Octad Generator" of R. T. Curtis.

Sunday, February 9, 2025

An AI Overview of Klein Quadric and MOG

Filed under: General — Tags: , , — m759 @ 2:15 pm

See also a more accurate AI report from January 9, 2025 —

Grok 2 on the MOG and the Klein Correspondence:

HTML version, with corrections, of the above 9 January Grok 2 report —

Grok 2: Klein Correspondence and MOG, 9 Jan. 2025 . . .
______________________________________________

The Klein correspondence is closely related to the Miracle Octad Generator (MOG) through the mathematical structure they both engage with, particularly in the context of finite geometry and combinatorics.

Klein Correspondence: This refers to a mathematical framework that establishes a correspondence between points and lines in a projective space.* Specifically, in the context of the MOG, it relates to the geometry of PG(3,2), the three-dimensional projective space over the field with two elements. The Klein correspondence, in this context, essentially connects the combinatorial aspects of partitions of an 8-set to the geometric structure of lines in PG(3,2).

Miracle Octad Generator (MOG): Introduced by R.T. Curtis, the MOG is a tool used in the study of the Mathieu group M24, the binary Golay code, and related structures like the Steiner system S(5,8,24). It consists of a 4×6 array where the positions are used to construct octads (sets of 8 elements) from given sets of 5 elements, reflecting the structure of the Steiner system.

Relation Between Klein Correspondence and MOG:

  • Combinatorial and Geometric Link: The MOG uses the Klein correspondence to map partitions of an 8-set (into two 4-sets) to [the sets of] 4 parallel affine planes [that represent lines] within PG(3,2). This mapping is natural and symmetrical, which is crucial for the MOG's functionality. The 35 partitions of an 8-set correspond to the 35 lines in PG(3,2), and this correspondence helps in understanding how to generate and visualize octads within the MOG framework.
     
  • Structural Insight: The Klein correspondence provides a way to see how the MOG's method of generating octads can be understood geometrically. This insight is vital for exploring the symmetry and subgroup structure of M24, as the MOG's layout preserves these symmetries.

Thus, the Klein correspondence serves as a foundational link that allows the MOG to operate by translating combinatorial problems into geometric ones, facilitating the study of complex mathematical structures like the Mathieu groups and Steiner systems.

* Correction: Should be "a correspondence between points in a five-dimensional projective space and lines in a three-dimensional projective space."

Update  of ca. 9 AM ET Monday, Feb. 10, 2024 —

Neither AI report above mentions the Cullinane model of the five-
dimensional projective space PG(5,2) as a brick space — a space
whose points are the 2×4 bricks  used in thte MOG. This is
understandable, as the notion of using bricks to model both  PG(5,2)
and PG(3,2) has appeared so far only in this journal. See an
illustration from New Year's Eve . . . Dec. 31, 2024 —

The Miracle Octad Generator (MOG) of R. T. Curtis

Thursday, January 9, 2025

Grok 2 on the MOG and the Klein Correspondence

Filed under: General — Tags: , , , — m759 @ 1:04 pm

Related illustration —

The Miracle Octad Generator (MOG) of R. T. Curtis

— Transcription —

Grok 2 on Klein correspondence and MOG — 9 Jan. 2025
______________________________________________________________

Prompt:

How is the Klein correspondence related to the Miracle Octad Generator?

Grok 2 response (with citations and links removed):

The Klein correspondence is closely related to the Miracle Octad Generator (MOG) through the mathematical structure they both engage with, particularly in the context of finite geometry and combinatorics.

Klein Correspondence: This refers to a mathematical framework that establishes a correspondence between points and lines in a projective space. Specifically, in the context of the MOG, it relates to the geometry of PG(3,2), the three-dimensional projective space over the field with two elements. The Klein correspondence, in this context, essentially connects the combinatorial aspects of partitions of an 8-set to the geometric structure of lines in PG(3,2).

Miracle Octad Generator (MOG): Introduced by R.T. Curtis, the MOG is a tool used in the study of the Mathieu group M24, the binary Golay code, and related structures like the Steiner system S(5,8,24). It consists of a 4×6 array where the positions are used to construct octads (sets of 8 elements) from given sets of 5 elements, reflecting the structure of the Steiner system.

Relation Between Klein Correspondence and MOG:

    Combinatorial and Geometric Link: The MOG uses the Klein correspondence to map partitions of an 8-set (into two 4-sets) to 4 parallel affine planes within PG(3,2). This mapping is natural and symmetrical, which is crucial for the MOG's functionality. The 35 partitions of an 8-set correspond to the 35 lines in PG(3,2), and this correspondence helps in understanding how to generate and visualize octads within the MOG framework.

    Structural Insight: The Klein correspondence provides a way to see how the MOG's method of generating octads can be understood geometrically. This insight is vital for exploring the symmetry and subgroup structure of M24, as the MOG's layout preserves these symmetries.

Thus, the Klein correspondence serves as a foundational link that allows the MOG to operate by translating combinatorial problems into geometric ones, facilitating the study of complex mathematical structures like the Mathieu groups and Steiner systems.

Sunday, November 17, 2024

Weyl, Symmetry, and the MOG
(HTML version of an earlier post)

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 1:16 am

Some historical background for a new book by Robert T. Curtis,
The Art of Working with the Mathieu Group M24 

"Space is another example of an entity endowed with a structure.
Here the elements are points, and the structure is established
in terms of certain basic relations between points such as:
A, B, C lie on a straight line, AB is congruent CD, and the like.
What we learn from our whole discussion and what has indeed
become a guiding principle in modern mathematics is this lesson:
Whenever you have to do with a structure endowed entity Σ
try to determine its group of automorphisms
, the group of those
element-wise transformations which leave all structural relations
undisturbed. You can expect to gain a deep insight into the
constitution of Σ in this way. After that you may start to investigate
symmetric configurations of elements, i.e. configurations which are
invariant under a certain subgroup of the group of all automorphisms;
and it may be advisable, before looking for such configurations,
to study the subgroups themselves, e.g. the subgroup of those
automorphisms which leave one element fixed, or leave two distinct
elements fixed, and investigate what discontinuous or finite subgroups
there exist, and so forth."

— Hermann Weyl, Symmetry, Princeton University Press, 1952.
(Page 144 in the Princeton Science Library edition of 1989.)

4×4 Square
       
       
       
       

This square's automorphism group
has 322,560 transformations.

— The diamond theorem  of Steven H. Cullinane.

4×6 Rectangle
           
           
           
           

This rectangle's automorphism group
has 244,823,040 transformations.

— The Miracle Octad Generator  (MOG) of Robert T. Curtis.

The rectangle's automorphism group contains the
square's as a subgroup. The square's automorphism
group leaves invariant a set of 30 eight-subsquare sets
called affine hyperplanes. The rectangle's automorphism
group leaves invariant a set of 759 eight-subsquare sets
called octads.

View this post as a PDF.

Tuesday, April 7, 2020

Moonshine, the MOG, and the Hexacode

Filed under: General — m759 @ 9:26 pm

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Note on the MOG Correspondence

Filed under: General,Geometry — Tags: , — m759 @ 4:15 pm

In light of the April 23 post "The Six-Set,"
the caption at the bottom of a note of April 26, 1986
seems of interest:

"The R. T. Curtis correspondence between the 35 lines and the
2-subsets and 3-subsets of a 6-set. This underlies M24."

A related note from today:

IMAGE- Three-sets in the Curtis MOG

Friday, May 14, 2010

Competing MOG Definitions

Filed under: General,Geometry — Tags: , , , — m759 @ 9:00 pm

A recently created Wikipedia article says that  “The Miracle Octad Generator [MOG] is an array of coordinates, arranged in four rows and six columns, capable of describing any point in 24-dimensional space….” (Clearly any  array with 24 parts is so capable.) The article ignores the fact that the MOG, as defined by R.T. Curtis in 1976, is not  an array of coordinates, but rather a picture of a correspondence between two sets, each containing 35 structures. (As a later commentator has remarked, this correspondence is a well-known one that preserves a certain incidence property. See Eightfold Geometry.)

From the 1976 paper defining the MOG—

“There is a correspondence between the two systems of 35 groups, which is illustrated in Fig. 4 (the MOG or Miracle Octad Generator).” —R.T. Curtis, “A New Combinatorial Approach to M24,” Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society  (1976), 79: 25-42

http://www.log24.com/log/pix10A/100514-Curtis1976MOG.jpg

Curtis’s 1976 Fig. 4. (The MOG.)

The Wikipedia article, like a similar article at PlanetMath, is based on a different definition, from a book first published in 1988—

http://www.log24.com/log/pix10A/100514-SpherePack.jpg

I have not seen the 1973 Curtis paper, so I do not know whether it uses the 35-sets correspondence definition or the 6×4 array definition. The remarks of Conway and Sloane on page 312 of the 1998 edition of their book about “Curtis’s original way of finding octads in the MOG [Cur2]” indicate that the correspondence definition was the one Curtis used in 1973—

http://www.log24.com/log/pix10A/100514-ConwaySloaneMOG.jpg

Here the picture of  “the 35 standard sextets of the MOG”
is very like (modulo a reflection) Curtis’s 1976 picture
of the MOG as a correspondence between two 35-sets.

A later paper by Curtis does  use the array definition. See “Further Elementary Techniques Using the Miracle Octad Generator,” Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society  (1989) 32, 345-353.

The array definition is better suited to Conway’s use of his hexacode  to describe octads, but it obscures the close connection of the MOG with finite geometry. That connection, apparent in the phrases “vector space structure in the standard square” and “parallel 2-spaces” (Conway and Sloane, third ed., p. 312, illustrated above), was not discussed in the 1976 Curtis paper.  See my own page on the MOG at finitegeometry.org.

Sunday, May 10, 2026

Dance of the Octads and Pentads

Filed under: General — m759 @ 10:35 pm

From http://m759.net/wordpress/?s=Dirac+Eddington . . .

Here is an explicit picture of the pentads

Anticommuting Dirac matrices as spreads of projective lines

The natural habitat of Eddington's pentads is the Nordstrom-Robinson code —

Click to enlarge:

IMAGE - The 112 hexads of the Nordstrom-Robinson code

For some context, see the group of order 322,560 in Geometry of the 4×4 Square.

Sunday, May 3, 2026

August 22, 2024 — Log24 Meets Code Golf —
Alpha and Omega, Heaven and Earth, Lock and Key

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 4:23 pm

Monday, April 20, 2026

NotebookLM Report:  Grid as Portal

Filed under: General — Tags: — m759 @ 11:03 am
 

Mapping the Infinite: A Visual Guide
to the Cullinane Diamond Theorem

[ NotebookLM report on April 20, 2026 ]

1. The Canvas: The 4×4 Diamond Figure (D)

Welcome, fellow explorers of the visible and the abstract. Our journey into the heart of finite geometry begins with a deceptively simple object: the Diamond Figure D. Far from being a mere decorative motif, this grid serves as a portal—a visual coordinate system for a high-dimensional universe that otherwise remains hidden from the naked eye.

Figure D is defined by three essential physical characteristics:

  • The 16-Tile Array: A 4×4 square grid comprising 16 individual square cells.
  • The Diagonal Split: Every single square tile is divided diagonally into two distinct triangles.
  • The Two-Color System: A binary coloring scheme (typically black and white) is applied to the triangles, creating a directional "diamond" or "chevron" tension.

This specific configuration is the "key" to unlocking deep mathematics because it forces abstract algebraic structures into the open. By dividing the cells diagonally, we create a visual language that responds to movement and rotation, allowing us to "see" the properties of a finite field through the interplay of light and shadow.

As we look upon this static grid, realize that it is but a single state in a vast ocean of possibilities. To understand its true nature, we must set the grid in motion.

——————————————————————————–

2. The Engine of Transformation: Group G and Symmetry Invariance

When we rearrange this 4×4 grid, we are not simply playing with tiles; we are invoking the power of Group G. This mathematical engine is isomorphic to AGL(4,2)—the full affine group of a 4-dimensional vector space over the field of two elements. It consists of a staggering 322,560 distinct permutations.

These transformations are built from three primary rules:

Primary Transformation Rule

Description

Permutations of Rows

Any of the four rows may be swapped or rearranged in any of the 4! possible ways.

Permutations of Columns

Any of the four columns may be swapped or rearranged in any of the 4! possible ways.

Permutations of Quadrants

The grid's four 2×2 blocks (quadrants) can be swapped or permuted as independent units.

The "So What?" of the Diamond Theorem The revelation of Steven Cullinane’s theorem is its absolute Symmetry Invariance. No matter which of the 322,560 scrambles you apply, the resulting image always retains a discernible structure. It is never a random mess. Specifically, every G-image of D exhibits either:

  1. Ordinary Geometric Symmetry: Standard rotational or reflectional symmetry.
  2. Color-Interchange Symmetry: A property where the pattern remains identical if you swap all black sections for white and vice versa.

These 2D shuffles are actually the "shadows" of a higher-dimensional origin, acting as a flat projection of a four-dimensional world.

——————————————————————————–

3. Dimensional Collapse: From 3D Cubes to 2D Arrays

To truly "grok" the Diamond Theorem, we must view the 16 cells of the grid as witnesses to 4-dimensional symmetry. The 4×4 grid is a "dimensional collapse" of a tesseract (a 4D hypercube) onto a flat surface.

The Steps of Dimensional Mapping:

  1. Labeling with Affine 4-Space: We label each cell with a point from the affine 4-space over the finite field GF(2).
  2. Binary Positioning: Coordinates (0 and 1) are assigned to represent positions across four dimensions.
  3. The Hypercube Map: The 16 vertices of a tesseract are mapped directly onto the 16 cells of the square array.

The Parallelogram Rule of Vector Addition In this 4×4 space, geometry and algebra become one through the Parallelogram Rule. In a standard 3D space, if you have two vectors u and v, their sum w = u + v forms the diagonal of a parallelogram. On our 4×4 grid, this manifests visually: picking any two "direction" vectors automatically defines a third vertex. This means that vector addition in 4D space is performed directly on the grid; the "sum" of two cells is always another specific cell, maintaining a perfect triangular closure within the array.

This mapping turns a difficult-to-visualize 4D space into a visual "calculator" where geometric intuition replaces complex calculation.

——————————————————————————–

4. The Visual Language of Finite Fields: GF(16) and Binary XOR

The grid functions as a map of the finite field GF(16). Operations here utilize "Binary Addition," better known to computer scientists as the XOR operation (where 1 + 1 = 0).

The Zero-Sum Property and Closure Every pattern in this system can be decomposed into three "line diagrams." When these diagrams (D_1, D_2, D_3) are combined, they follow a strict "Zero-Sum" rule: D_1 + D_2 + D_3 = 0. In finite geometry, this represents the : if you have two points of a line, the third point is "forced" into existence to complete the set. The symmetry of the final pattern is inevitable because the algebra is perfectly balanced.

This visual language reveals the structure of the projective space PG(3,2):

  • The 15 Points: There are 15 possible basic line diagrams, representing the 15 points of the projective space.
  • The 35 Lines: The 840 distinct images produced by Group G fall into 35 families of patterns. Each family represents a "line" in the projective space—a set of three points that XOR to zero.

These abstract "lines" are not straight paths but families of symmetry, representing physical alignment and orthogonality in a finite world.

——————————————————————————–

5. Advanced Correspondences: Latin Squares and Skew Lines  [Table rewritten from NotebookLM version]

One of the most revolutionary aspects of the Diamond Theorem is how it bridges combinatorial puzzles and abstract geometry. Specifically, it provides a dictionary for "seeing" algebraic independence.

Within the 35 families of patterns, we find that exactly six special order-4 Latin squares have orthogonal mates. The theorem shows that the combinatorial "orthogonality" of these squares is actually a geometric property in disguise.

Combinatorial Term

Orthogonal Latin Squares

Superimposed grids showing every ordered pair of symbols exactly once.

Geometric Translation

Skew Lines in PG(3,2)

The Visual Outcome

Disjoint sets of line 
diagrams.

When a student sees that two patterns are "orthogonal," they are literally looking at skew lines—lines that exist in the same 3D projective space but never meet. Algebraic independence has never been more visible.

——————————————————————————–

6. The Tapestry of Application: From Quilts to Deep Space

The Cullinane Diamond Theorem proves that symmetry is not a decorative choice, but a mathematical inevitability found in everything from folk art to the stars.

  1. Quilt Design: Ancient artisans unintentionally utilized finite geometry. The theorem explains why traditional quilt blocks (like the "diamond" and "chevron") possess pervasive symmetry—they were tapping into the AGL(4,2) group without knowing it.
  2. The MOG & M24: The theorem is a visual sister to the Miracle Octad Generator (MOG). The symmetry group G is isomorphic to the octad stabilizer subgroup of the Mathieu group M_{24}, one of the mysterious sporadic simple groups.
  3. The Leech Lattice: These patterns serve as a visual bridge to the Leech Lattice, the most efficient way to pack spheres in 24 dimensions. The lattice is essentially a "blown-up" version of the Steiner system S(5,8,24) that governs these 4×4 symmetries.
  4. Coding Theory & Uninterrupted Cuts: The theorem is deeply linked to the Golay code, used by the Voyager probes to send clear images from deep space. Within the "Diamond Ring" of patterns, there exists an ideal of 1024 patterns characterized by "uninterrupted cuts" (where all horizontal or vertical lines remain unbroken). These patterns represent the peak of structural stability used in error-correcting codes.

——————————————————————————–

7. Summary Checklist for the Aspiring Learner

As you gaze upon the next 4×4 pattern you encounter, use this checklist to verify your understanding of the secrets "hidden in plain sight":

  • [ ] I understand that the 4×4 grid is a visual map of a 4-dimensional vector space.
  • [ ] I recognize that symmetry is preserved because the transformations are governed by the full affine group AGL(4,2).
  • [ ] I see that a "line" in this geometry is actually a family of three patterns that XOR to zero.
  • [ ] I can visualize the Parallelogram Rule, where adding two positions on the grid "forces" the third into existence.
  • [ ] I recognize the 1024 patterns with uninterrupted cuts as the mathematical "ideal" within the diamond ring.
  • [ ] I understand that orthogonal Latin squares are simply the visual manifestation of skew lines in projective space.

Keep your eyes open, for the infinite is often mapped onto the smallest of canvases.

Sunday, April 19, 2026

Studio Tools . . . Continues.

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 3:50 am

Claude in "Notorious" (1946) —

"I'm in with the in grid, I go where the in grid goes."

Monday, April 13, 2026

“Mathematics, Not Theology” —
The Geometry of the Miracle Octad Generator
by NotebookLM on April 13, 2026

Filed under: General — m759 @ 1:11 pm
 
The relationship between the Cullinane Diamond Theorem and R. T. Curtis's Miracle Octad Generator (MOG) represents a profound mathematical unification of visual patterns, finite geometry, and sporadic simple groups. The MOG is a combinatorial tool that utilizes a 4×6 array to study the Mathieu group M24, the Steiner system S(5,8,24), and the binary Golay code. The Diamond Theorem provides the geometric and algebraic foundation for the MOG through the following key connections:
 
1. Isomorphic Combinatorial Structures
 
The core connection is that the 35 distinct square patterns analyzed in the Diamond Theorem are fundamentally the same as the 35 square patterns utilized within the MOG. In both contexts, these patterns are visually and algebraically isomorphic to the 35 lines of the finite projective space PG(3,2). The same visual "line diagrams" that explain the symmetries of the Diamond Theorem's 4×4 figures identically explain the structural symmetries of Curtis's MOG patterns.
 
2. The Octad Stabilizer Subgroup of M24 

The transformation group G that scrambles the 4×4 array in the Diamond Theorem consists of 322,560 permutations and is isomorphic to the affine group AGL(4,2). Within the framework of the MOG, Curtis demonstrated that this exact symmetry group (which he denoted as 24.A8) functions as the octad stabilizer subgroup of the sporadic simple group M24. Thus, the group defining the symmetries of the 4×4 diamond configurations is mathematically identical to the subgroup that stabilizes an 8-element "octad" within the 24-point Steiner system S(5,8,24). 

3. The Conwell/Klein Correspondence 

The mathematical architecture bridging these concepts is the Klein correspondence (and Conwell's 1910 correspondence), which establishes a mapping between the 35 lines of PG(3,2) and the 35 ways to partition an 8-set into two 4-sets. The MOG physically illustrates this correspondence by pairing partitions of an 8-set (represented by a 4×2 array) with the 35 partitions of the 4×4 affine space. The Diamond Theorem translates these abstract combinatorial partitions into concrete symmetric properties governed by binary arithmetic (where components sum to zero via XOR). 

Ultimately, the Diamond Theorem serves as the geometric justification that explains why the 4×4 subarrays of the Miracle Octad Generator possess their highly structured symmetries, linking simple 2D tile arrangements to the complex algebra required for error-correcting codes and the construction of the Leech lattice.

Saturday, April 4, 2026

Geometry of the Diamond Theorem
and the Mathieu Group
by NotebookLM on April 4, 2026

Filed under: General — m759 @ 5:14 am
 

Based on the provided sources, the connection between the Cullinane Diamond Theorem and the Mathieu group M24 is established through group theory, finite geometry, and a combinatorial tool known as the Miracle Octad Generator (MOG).

1. Group Theoretic Connection:
    The Octad Stabilizer

The most direct link lies in the symmetry groups governing both structures.
  • The Diamond Theorem's Group (G): The theorem involves a group G of 322,560 permutations acting on a 4×4 grid of two-color tiles. This group is isomorphic to the affine group AGL(4,2), which consists of all invertible affine transformations on a 4-dimensional vector space over the field with two elements, GF(2).
  • The M24 Connection: This specific group, AGL(4,2), is identified as the octad stabilizer subgroup of the Mathieu group M24. In the context of the Steiner system S(5,8,24) preserved by M24, this subgroup fixes one "octad" (an 8-element set) and permutes the remaining 16 points according to the affine geometry of the 4×4 grid.
2. The Miracle Octad Generator (MOG)

The "Miracle Octad Generator," developed by R.T. Curtis to study M24 and the binary Golay code, serves as the bridge between the visual patterns of the Diamond Theorem and the abstract algebra of the Mathieu group.
  • Shared Structures: The Diamond Theorem identifies 35 distinct combinatorial structures (sets of line diagrams) arising from the permutations of the diamond figure. These structures are essentially the same as the 35 square patterns found within the MOG.
  • Geometric Construction: The MOG uses a 4×6 array, consisting of three 4×2 "bricks." Two of these bricks form a 4×4 square. The Diamond Theorem provides the geometric justification for the symmetries observed in this 4×4 part of the MOG, relating them to the 35 lines of the finite projective space PG(3,2).
  • Generating Octads: The MOG uses these patterns to construct the 759 octads of the Steiner system S(5,8,24), for which M24 is the automorphism group.
3. Geometric Unification

The connection is further unified by finite geometries that underlie both systems:
  • PG(3,2): The 35 lines of the projective space PG(3,2) correspond to the 35 structures in the Diamond Theorem and the MOG.
  • Klein Correspondence: The MOG and the Diamond Theorem structures are linked via the Klein correspondence, which maps the 35 lines of PG(3,2) to points on the Klein quadric in PG(5,2). This geometry is fundamental to understanding the maximal subgroups of M24.
In summary, the group that shuffles the Diamond Theorem's 4×4 tiles is physically the same mathematical object (up to isomorphism) as the subgroup of M24 that stabilizes an octad, and the visual patterns produced are the geometric building blocks of the Miracle Octad Generator used to construct M24.

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Review

Filed under: General — Tags: — m759 @ 6:57 pm

Other posts now tagged Cube-Motif Octads.

Monday, January 26, 2026

Twin Pillars

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 9:59 am

The "Gray Lotus" octad within the Miracle Octad Generator
(MOG) framework of Robert T. Curtis might be called, for
fans of Freemasonry, The Twin Pillars.

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Today Is World Logic Day 2026

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 12:34 pm

"The date chosen to celebrate World Logic Day, 14 January, corresponds to
the date of death of Kurt Gödel and the date of birth of Alfred Tarski,.
two of the most prominent logicians of the twentieth century." — Wikipedia

Some "presentatonal symbols" — The Gray Lotus.

Diamond Theory
by NotebookLM

94 sources

The Cullinane diamond theorem establishes a profound link between visual 4×4 patterns and advanced mathematical structures such as finite geometry and group theory. By analyzing symmetry-preserving transformations within a group of 322,560 permutations, the research connects simple grid designs to the complex projective space PG(3,2). These geometric frameworks further extend into coding theory, illustrating how "diamond" rings are isomorphic to matrix algebras over the finite field GF(4). The sources also highlight the Miracle Octad Generator (MOG) and its relationship to the Mathieu group M24, which is essential for understanding error-correcting codes and sphere packings. Beyond pure mathematics, the text explores "brick space" and the Klein correspondence, suggesting that these abstract symmetries represent a "universal" order found in both art and nature. Ultimately, this body of work bridges the gap between ancient motifs and modern computational science through the elegant study of structural invariants.

 
Thursday, November 20, 2025

How are algebraic, combinatorial, and geometric structures unified within the Brick Space model?

The unification of algebraic, combinatorial, and geometric structures within the Brick Space model is achieved through its role as a graphic, isomorphic representation of key finite geometries, particularly the projective spaces PG(5,2) and PG(3,2), and their fundamental relationship via the Klein correspondence.

————————————————————————————.

The term "Brick Space" originates from the arrays, or "bricks," coined by R. T. Curtis as component parts of his Miracle Octad Generator (MOG)

. These physical or graphic arrangements serve as a concrete visualization (or model) of highly abstract mathematical structures.

1. Geometric Unification
The Brick Space model provides a geometric foundation for combinatorial objects through direct visualization of finite geometries defined over the two-element field, GF(2)
.
Modeling Projective Space: The Brick Space model is the natural geometric setting for the MOG's components, which may be regarded as forming both the 5-dimensional projective space and the 3-dimensional projective space
.
Visualizing PG(5,2) and the Klein Quadric: The model visually represents the space, which has 63 points, by partitioning these points into 28 points lying off the Klein quadric and 35 points lying on the Klein quadric

. The geometry of is linked to the concept of the 8-set

.
The Klein Correspondence: The geometric relationship between and is formalized by the Klein correspondence

. The model, developed as a brick space, is analogous to the "line diagrams" construction of found in the Cullinane diamond theorem

.
Lines and Points: The Brick Space implicitly models how the 35 lines of correspond to the 35 points on the Klein quadric in
.
2. Combinatorial Unification
Combinatorial structures, primarily partitions of sets and block designs, are mapped directly onto geometric entities within the Brick Space framework
.
Partitions and Lines: The central combinatorial equivalence involves mapping partitions of sets to geometric objects

. The 35 combinatorial structures arising from permutations of diamond tiles (related to the bricks) are isomorphic to the 35 lines of . These 35 structures also mirror the 35 square patterns within the original MOG

.
Partitions of the 8-Set: The lines correspond to the 35 partitions of an 8-set into two 4-sets

. This same framework connects to the 105 partitions of an 8-set into four 2-sets, which are essentially the same as the 105 lines contained in the Klein quadric

.
Latin Squares: The combinatorial property of orthogonality of Latin squares (specifically, order-4 Latin squares) is unified geometrically by corresponding exactly to the property of skewness of lines (non-intersecting lines) in

. This provides a geometric dictionary for abstract algebraic combinatorics

.
3. Algebraic Unification
Algebraic structures, rooted in finite field theory and group theory, govern the behavior and symmetries observed in the combinatorial and geometric models
.
Binary Field : The foundation of the geometry is the Galois field of two elements, (binary arithmetic: )

. The algebraic rules of dictate the structure of the affine and projective spaces represented by the bricks

.
Binary Addition (XOR): The line diagrams used to formalize the patterns (related to the bricks) can be "added" via component-wise binary addition (XOR)

. The closure property of lines in is represented algebraically by the fact that the three line diagrams corresponding to a pattern always sum to zero ()

.
Group Theory and Symmetry: The massive permutation group (of order 322,560) that transforms the visual patterns is isomorphic to the affine group

. This group, which explains the pervasive symmetry found in all -images, is the automorphism group of the underlying finite geometry, establishing the algebraic control over the system's geometric and combinatorial properties

.
Ring Theory: The patterns can be endowed with algebraic structure to generate an ideal within a ring of symmetric patterns, leading to an infinite family of "diamond rings" isomorphic to rings of matrices over

. This links the geometry to the machinery of abstract algebra

.
M24 Connection: The affine group is identified as the octad stabilizer subgroup of the Mathieu group

, linking the visual patterns and the underlying geometries to the abstract world of sporadic simple groups, coding theory (Golay code), and lattice theory (Leech lattice)

.
The Brick Space model, therefore, functions as a visual tapestry where graphic arrangements (geometry/visualization) encode set partitions (combinatorics) that behave according to the rules of binary algebra ( and affine groups)

. The entire structure is unified by powerful isomorphisms relating these three mathematical domains through finite geometries like and

Monday, December 29, 2025

Octad Art — Bricks, Cubes, Flowers

For the bricks of the title, see other posts tagged Brick Space
For some cubes* and flowers, see below.

Combining features of the above two images, one might picture the 24
cells of the 4×6 array underlying the Curtis Miracle Octad Generator
(MOG) as each containing an eightfold cube, pictured as above with seven
of its subcubes showing and an eighth subcube hidden behind them.

The seven visible subcubes may be colored, as in the Curtis image of
the Klein map, with seven distinct colors… corresponding to the seven
edge-colors used in the Curtis-Klein map. Each of the seven visible
subcubes in a cell may also be labeled, on its visible faces, with a symbol
denoting one of the 24 points of the projective line over GF(23), just as the
faces in the Curtis-Klein map are labeled.  The hidden subcube in each cell
may be regarded as also so labeled, by the MOG label of the cell's position.

There is then enough information in the array's eightfold cubes' colors and
labels to construct the seven generating permutations of M24 described by
Curtis, and the 24 array cells may be regarded as now containing 24 distinct
entities — which perhaps might be called "octoids."

Those desiring a more decorative approach may replace the 24 labeled cubes
with 24 labeled "flowers." Each flower — like the map's symmetric seven
"petals" and the central "infinity heptagon" they surround — forms an octad.

Related Illustrations . . .

* See as well posts tagged Mathieu Cube . . .

Related material — 

The 56 triangles of  the eightfold cube . . .

The Eightfold Cube: The Beauty of Klein's Simple Group

   Image from Christmas Day 2005.

Post last revised:  December 30, 2025 @ 21:30 E.S.T.

Friday, December 5, 2025

Today’s “Diamond Theory” NotebookLM Summary

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 12:17 pm
 

Diamond Theory by NotebookLM

92 sources

The collected sources discuss the intricate confluence of finite geometry and abstract combinatorics, focusing heavily on the smallest three-dimensional projective space, PG(3,2), which acts as the geometric model for structures derived from the 6-set and 8-set. A primary focus is the Cullinane Diamond Theorem and the visual representation of abstract symmetries using 4×4 arrays, whose enormous automorphism group, the Affine group AGL(4,2), relates combinatorial design to geometric transformations. These connections are formalized using the Miracle Octad Generator (MOG) and the Klein Correspondence, which map partitions of an 8-set onto geometric objects like the lines of PG(3,2) and the points of the Klein quadric in PG(5,2). Furthermore, this framework bridges pure mathematics to applied fields, establishing relationships between geometric concepts like Conwell's Heptads and spreads (line partitions) and applications in algebraic ring theory, error-correcting codes, and the study of the sporadic simple group M24. Ultimately, the sources highlight how the symmetry inherent in these designs offers essential geometric insight into complex algebraic and combinatorial problems.

Thursday, December 4, 2025

Today’s NotebookLM “Diamond Theory” Summary

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 8:13 am
 

Diamond Theory by NotebookLM

92 sources

The documents provide a comprehensive overview of advanced abstract algebra and combinatorics, centered on the finite projective space PG(3,2), which models the geometry of the 6-set. A primary focus is the Diamond Theorem, which uses the symmetries of 4×4 array patterns to establish deep connections between the visual arts, group theory, and geometry. The vast transformation set known as the Affine Group AGL(4,2), possessing an order of 322,560, is shown to preserve the structural relations of these arrays, which in turn are linked to the properties of lines and planes in PG(3,2). These geometric and combinatorial linkages are essential for understanding the Miracle Octad Generator (MOG) of R. T. Curtis and its relationship to the sporadic simple group Mathieu group M24. Additionally, the sources examine complex geometric partitions, such as Conwell’s Heptads and isotropic spreads within spaces like PG(5,2), demonstrating how group actions classify these objects and relate to applications in error-correcting codes. Ultimately, this body of work illustrates a powerful mathematical unity, presenting geometry, algebra, and combinatorics as tightly interwoven disciplines.

Wednesday, December 3, 2025

Today’s Diamond Theory Summary from NotebookLM

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 9:42 am

Diamond Theory by NotebookLM

92 sources

The sources detail the profound mathematical correspondences linking visual, combinatorial, and abstract algebraic structures, primarily focusing on the finite projective space PG(3,2) and the affine group AGL(4,2). A central component is the Cullinane diamond theorem, which uses highly symmetric 4×4 grid patterns to model the AGL(4,2) transformation group, whose large order of 322,560 governs the symmetry of the arrangements. These geometric models are tied directly to deep combinatorial structures, specifically the Miracle Octad Generator (MOG) and the sporadic simple group Mathieu group M24, offering a unified framework for understanding octads and partitions like Conwell's Heptads. Further discussion establishes how geometric entities such as spreads, packings, and the Klein correspondence provide solutions for classic problems like the "schoolgirl problem" and inform contemporary areas like error-correcting codes and the classification of group orbits. This interplay extends even to physics, connecting the geometries to quantum space-time and two-qubit observables, demonstrating how abstract finite geometry underlies sophisticated concepts across various scientific and artistic disciplines.

Tuesday, December 2, 2025

Today’s NotebookLM “Diamond Theory” Summary

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 10:07 am
 

Diamond Theory by NotebookLM

92 sources

This collection of texts examines the profound mathematical unity connecting finite geometry, group theory, and visual combinatorics, centered largely on the projective space PG(3,2) and the associated Affine Group AGL(4,2). The geometry is often modeled using structures like the 4×4 array or "Brick Space," where the action of the group AGL(4,2) (order 322,560) explains the symmetries of abstract diamond patterns. Central to this framework are classical structures like Conwell's Heptads and the Klein Quadric, which are shown to be crucial in partitioning spaces like PG(5,2) and constructing spreads used in coding theory. The material extensively links these geometric models, including the Miracle Octad Generator (MOG), to the exceptional symmetries of the Mathieu group M24 through stabilizer subgroups. Furthermore, these abstract concepts find applications in diverse fields, providing geometric insights into Mutually Orthogonal Latin Squares (MOLS), algebraic ring structures, and analogies within quantum physics related to qubit observables. The overarching theme demonstrates how symmetry, whether in abstract geometric configurations or visual quilt designs, is rooted in the deep logic of finite algebraic structure.

Monday, December 1, 2025

“Diamond Theory” at NotebookLM Today

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 8:29 am

NotebookLM — Dec. 1, 2025 — "A Unifying Framework"

Diamond Theory by NotebookLM

92 sources

These documents comprehensively examine the tight relationships among abstract algebra, combinatorics, and finite geometry, primarily through the lens of the projective spaces PG(3,2) and PG(5,2). A central focus is the Cullinane Diamond Theory, which utilizes highly symmetric 4×4 arrays over the Galois field GF(2) to model affine space, whose transformation group is the extensive Affine Group AGL(4,2). This visual and geometric structure connects directly to classic combinatorial objects, such as Conwell's Heptads and Dye's Partitions, which define specific sets and orbits within the geometry. Critically, these underlying symmetries are fundamental to the operation of the Miracle Octad Generator (MOG), establishing a direct link between the patterns of the 4×4 arrays and the intricate structure of the sporadic simple Mathieu group M24. The established correspondence provides crucial geometric interpretations for abstract algebraic problems, including the classification of reguli and the construction of Mutually Orthogonal Latin Squares. Collectively, the material demonstrates a unifying mathematical framework that spans theoretical geometry, error-correcting codes, quantum information science, and visual art.

Friday, November 28, 2025

“Crucially”

Filed under: General — Tags: — m759 @ 10:20 am

From the NotebookLM notebook "Diamond Theory" today —

"Crucially, the underlying geometric symmetry
ties directly into the functionality of the
Miracle Octad Generator (MOG),
which models the highly exceptional properties of
the sporadic simple group M24."

The above geometric symmetry is based on properties of
the unique even prime  number 2. For an introduction to
symmetry propeties of odd  primes, see the previous post.

"If it's a seamless whole you want, pray to Apollo."

Margaret Atwood on tricksters.

Thursday, November 20, 2025

On Brick Space

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 6:24 pm

A question suggested by NotebookLM in the "Diamond Theory" notebook,
and its answer today by NotebookLM —

How are algebraic, combinatorial, and geometric structures unified within the Brick Space model?

The unification of algebraic, combinatorial, and geometric structures within the Brick Space model is achieved through its role as a graphic, isomorphic representation of key finite geometries, particularly the projective spaces PG(5,2) and PG(3,2), and their fundamental relationship via the Klein correspondence

.
The term "Brick Space" originates from the arrays, or "bricks," coined by R. T. Curtis as component parts of his Miracle Octad Generator (MOG)

. These physical or graphic arrangements serve as a concrete visualization (or model) of highly abstract mathematical structures

.
1. Geometric Unification
The Brick Space model provides a geometric foundation for combinatorial objects through direct visualization of finite geometries defined over the two-element field, GF(2)
.
Modeling Projective Space: The Brick Space model is the natural geometric setting for the MOG's components, which may be regarded as forming both the 5-dimensional projective space and the 3-dimensional projective space
.
Visualizing PG(5,2) and the Klein Quadric: The model visually represents the space, which has 63 points, by partitioning these points into 28 points lying off the Klein quadric and 35 points lying on the Klein quadric

. The geometry of is linked to the concept of the 8-set

.
The Klein Correspondence: The geometric relationship between and is formalized by the Klein correspondence

. The model, developed as a brick space, is analogous to the "line diagrams" construction of found in the Cullinane diamond theorem

.
Lines and Points: The Brick Space implicitly models how the 35 lines of correspond to the 35 points on the Klein quadric in
.
2. Combinatorial Unification
Combinatorial structures, primarily partitions of sets and block designs, are mapped directly onto geometric entities within the Brick Space framework
.
Partitions and Lines: The central combinatorial equivalence involves mapping partitions of sets to geometric objects

. The 35 combinatorial structures arising from permutations of diamond tiles (related to the bricks) are isomorphic to the 35 lines of . These 35 structures also mirror the 35 square patterns within the original MOG

.
Partitions of the 8-Set: The lines correspond to the 35 partitions of an 8-set into two 4-sets

. This same framework connects to the 105 partitions of an 8-set into four 2-sets, which are essentially the same as the 105 lines contained in the Klein quadric

.
Latin Squares: The combinatorial property of orthogonality of Latin squares (specifically, order-4 Latin squares) is unified geometrically by corresponding exactly to the property of skewness of lines (non-intersecting lines) in

. This provides a geometric dictionary for abstract algebraic combinatorics

.
3. Algebraic Unification
Algebraic structures, rooted in finite field theory and group theory, govern the behavior and symmetries observed in the combinatorial and geometric models
.
Binary Field : The foundation of the geometry is the Galois field of two elements, (binary arithmetic: )

. The algebraic rules of dictate the structure of the affine and projective spaces represented by the bricks

.
Binary Addition (XOR): The line diagrams used to formalize the patterns (related to the bricks) can be "added" via component-wise binary addition (XOR)

. The closure property of lines in is represented algebraically by the fact that the three line diagrams corresponding to a pattern always sum to zero ()

.
Group Theory and Symmetry: The massive permutation group (of order 322,560) that transforms the visual patterns is isomorphic to the affine group

. This group, which explains the pervasive symmetry found in all -images, is the automorphism group of the underlying finite geometry, establishing the algebraic control over the system's geometric and combinatorial properties

.
Ring Theory: The patterns can be endowed with algebraic structure to generate an ideal within a ring of symmetric patterns, leading to an infinite family of "diamond rings" isomorphic to rings of matrices over

. This links the geometry to the machinery of abstract algebra

.
M24 Connection: The affine group is identified as the octad stabilizer subgroup of the Mathieu group

, linking the visual patterns and the underlying geometries to the abstract world of sporadic simple groups, coding theory (Golay code), and lattice theory (Leech lattice)

.
The Brick Space model, therefore, functions as a visual tapestry where graphic arrangements (geometry/visualization) encode set partitions (combinatorics) that behave according to the rules of binary algebra ( and affine groups)

. The entire structure is unified by powerful isomorphisms relating these three mathematical domains through finite geometries like and .

Sunday, November 2, 2025

The Mystery of Brick Space . . .

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 11:42 pm

. . . is the title of a NotebookLM video now on YouTube —

See https://youtu.be/6zUKg4dNEbM .

The current NotebookLM summary for the Diamond Theory notebook, the source of the above video —

"These sources comprehensively explore the deep connections between finite geometry, particularly the projective spaces PG(3,2) and PG(5,2) over GF(2), and various topics in combinatorics, group theory, and coding theory. Central to this discussion are the Miracle Octad Generator (MOG) and the Cullinane Diamond Theorem, which model highly symmetric structures like the affine group AGL(4,2) and the sporadic Mathieu group M24 using geometric figures such as 4×4 arrays or 'brick space.' The geometry of PG(3,2), described as the 'smallest perfect universe,' is shown to be crucial, relating to concepts like Conwell's Heptads, Klein correspondence, spreads, and mutually orthogonal Latin squares (MOLS), which also have applications in error-correcting codes and quantum information theory involving n-qubits. Ultimately, these texts demonstrate how abstract mathematical symmetry is intrinsically linked across algebra, geometry, and visual art, often leveraging automorphism groups to reveal structural invariants."

Wednesday, October 22, 2025

Architecture: Alt-Modernism

Filed under: General — Tags: — m759 @ 2:36 pm

A search for "Modernism" in this journal yields . . .

Related material —

Friday, October 17, 2025

Sextet Space Cube

Filed under: General — Tags: , , , — m759 @ 11:45 am

Wednesday, October 15, 2025

Sextet Space

Filed under: General — Tags: , — m759 @ 4:46 pm

“Perhaps the philosophically most relevant feature of modern science
is the emergence of abstract symbolic structures as the hard core
of objectivity behind— as Eddington puts it— the colorful tale of
the subjective storyteller mind.”

— Hermann Weyl, Philosophy of  Mathematics and
    Natural Science 
, Princeton, 1949, p. 237

Melissa C. Wong, illustration for "Atlas to the Text,"
by Nicholas T. Rinehart:

The above fanciful illustration pictures 6*9=54 colored squares on the six 
faces of a 3x3x3 cube.

Compare and contrast the Aitchison  labeling, not unlike the one above,
of 6*4=24 unit squares (or, equivalently, 24 pips  at the squares' centers)
on a 2x2x2 cube.

Now consider how the 8-square "brick" of R. T. Curtis may be colored with
four colors using the 105 ways to partition its eight squares into four 2-sets.

By analogy, the 24  squares on a cube's  surface, as above, afford a cubical
space for applying six  colors to the sextet  partitions (into six 4-sets) of Curtis's
Miracle Octad Generator (MOG), using Aitchson's cubical model (with, of course,
the parts to be moved being pips or squares rather than cuboctahedron edges). 

The 4-coloring of Curtis bricks is useful in picturing the Klein correspondence.
Are there similar uses of  cube  6-colorings? Or 4-colorings? (Group actions on
a 6-set are of considerable combinatorial and algebraic interest because of
the exceptional outer automorphism of S6.)

For a colored presentation of sextet space modeled with a rectangle,
as in the Curtis MOG, see . . .

https://xenon.stanford.edu/~hwatheod/mog/mog.html .

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress